The Plays
Signals are raw material. A play is a strategy that turns a specific stack of signals into a specific kind of deal. Each play below is data-winnable — meaning the edge comes from the engine, not from luck or a Rolodex.
Five plays, ranked by margin and by difficulty of the data. Then the call on where to start.
See also: the-deal-engine · the-intelligence-layer · signals-and-data · kpis-and-reports · deal-lifecycle · two-lanes
A) Off-market motivated sellers
| Targets | Owners with a reason to sell before they list — and equity to discount |
| Data | Absentee/out-of-state + high equity + long hold + a distress flag (tax delinquency, code violation, vacancy) |
| Edge | No competition. You're talking before the listing exists. Margin lives here. |
| Difficulty | Hard — requires stacking owner + distress signals and skip-tracing contact |
This is where the real money is. When you reach a tired absentee landlord with high equity and a code-violation notice piling up, you're not bidding against anyone — you're solving their problem. The data is the hardest to assemble, which is exactly why the margin survives.
B) Mispriced on-market listings
| Targets | Listed properties priced below our modeled value |
| Data | Our AVM vs list price; stale days-on-market; price-cut history |
| Edge | Fastest way to validate the engine — listings are public and the feedback loop is days, not months |
| Difficulty | Easiest — on-market data is the most accessible signal we have |
Lower margin than off-market, but the data is clean and the loop is fast. This is the proving ground for the underwriting-and-scoring engine.
C) Cashflow-market screening
| Targets | Whole markets, ranked before any single property |
| Data | Cap rate + rent-to-price ratio by metro/zip; then hunt inside the winners |
| Edge | Pre-filters the universe — you only run expensive plays where the yield is structurally there |
| Difficulty | Medium — market data is free but ranking models take tuning |
Not a deal-finder on its own; it's the funnel that points the other plays at the right geography. Top-of-stack to Play A and B.
D) Value-add rent-gap
| Targets | Properties renting below market where light reno forces appreciation |
| Data | Current rent vs HUD FMR / market comps; condition (age, permits); reno cost estimate |
| Edge | You manufacture the equity — forced appreciation isn't dependent on the market rising |
| Difficulty | Medium — rent-gap is computable, but condition data is fuzzier |
The rent gap is the signal; the light renovation is the lever. Buy the gap, close it, force the value.
E) Path-of-progress
| Targets | Zips about to appreciate — bought before the wave |
| Data | Leading indicators: new transit, rezoning, permit velocity, business openings, in-migration |
| Edge | Buy ahead of the crowd; ride the appreciation the indicators predict |
| Difficulty | Hardest to predict — you're betting on a trajectory, not a current number |
The longest horizon and the appreciation play. Suits the equity lane, not the monthly-cashflow lane.
Difficulty vs edge
Where to start — the call
Don't chase the highest margin first. Prove the engine where the data is easiest and the feedback loop is fastest, then push into the margin.
Plays, buy-box, and the two lanes
Every play resolves to the same discipline: does the deal fit the buy-box? The buy-box is the per-lane filter — price band, target return, condition tolerance, hold horizon — that turns a scored lead into a "yes." A play surfaces candidates; the buy-box says which ones clear.
And the plays aren't one-size-fits-all across two-lanes:
| Play | Cashflow lane | Equity / appreciation lane |
|---|---|---|
| A — Off-market | ✓ discounted cashflow | ✓ deep-value entry |
| B — Mispriced on-market | ✓ primary | — |
| C — Market screen | ✓ ranks for yield | partial |
| D — Rent-gap | ✓ forces both | ✓ forced appreciation |
| E — Path-of-progress | — | ✓ primary |
Back to: the-deal-engine · the scoring mechanics live in the-intelligence-layer · what we measure in kpis-and-reports.